Bug#604477: marked as done (qa.debian.org: package versions sometimes does not list the version from "testing")
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:35:10 +0100
with message-id <20101122213510.GA5705@rivendell.home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#604477: qa.debian.org: package versions sometimes does not list the version from "testing"
has caused the Debian Bug report #604477,
regarding qa.debian.org: package versions sometimes does not list the version from "testing"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
604477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've noticed that sometimes the PTS page for apt [1] does not contain
the current version from "testing" as if the package was removed and
is currently only in "unstable". For example the current listing is:
old: 0.6.46.4-0.1+etch1
old-sec: 0.6.46.4-0.1+etch1
stable: 0.7.20.2+lenny2
stable-sec: 0.7.20.2+lenny1
testing-sec: 0.7.20.2+squeeze1
unstable: 0.8.9
Thanks
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/apt.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'squeeze-volatile'), (200, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Teodor wrote:
> I've noticed that sometimes the PTS page for apt [1] does not contain
> the current version from "testing" as if the package was removed and
> is currently only in "unstable". For example the current listing is:
This is a problem with mirror used. I switched to ftp.debian.org to avoid
the ftp.us.debian.org round robin that bounced us back and forth between a
good mirror and a bad one.
The PTS doesn't like when he goes backwards in history and finds a mirror
with older versions than what he had already seen (due to internal caches
to optimize the time needed to generate the pages).
Hopefully, everything should be fine in the next run. (And ftp.us has been
fixed by dropping the kernel.org mirror which is not in sync).
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: