[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect



On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:42:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
[...]
> > > New graphs are available on http://merkel.debian.org/~glandium/bts/
> > 
> > They look nice!
> > They even look correct and in sync with the PTS, at least from some
> > random checks!

I keep taking a look at those unofficial graphs, from time to time.

On a second thought, there's something that I don't especially like in
them, from an esthetic point of view.

If I compare them with the current official graphs, I notice a number
of cosmetic differences: many of them look like an enhancement to me,
but two of them seem to be a regression.

The first change I don't like is that the background grid is now made
up of dotted lines, rather than of solid lines.
I would prefer solid lines: I think they make the graph more readable.

The second change I don't appreciate too much is that the background
grid seems to have horizontal lines for integral values of the vertical
axis (which makes sense), but also for half steps (which does not make
sense to me: the number of bugs is always an integer, may a package
have 14.5 bugs? I guess it cannot...).
I would prefer having fewer horizontal lines (at most one for each
integral value of the vertical axis), since having too many horizontal
lines makes the graph hard to read.

I hope that constructive criticism may be helpful...   :-)

[...]
> > OK, I can understand that you want to do some more testing (and maybe
> > data collecting), before these new "creatures" go on-line as official
> > graphs!
> > 
> > But please do not wait one year, before making them official!  ;-)
> 
> Actually, I hope to be able to fill them with old data gathered from the
> BTS but that is currently stalling.

Is there any hope to see these new graphs going official before next
January?   ;-)


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
 Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpfe5CLAXcDN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: