Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> reopen 565219 !
> retitle 565219 qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are updated with excessive delay
> thanks
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:23:55 +0100 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > If I understand correctly, the problem I reported is now fixed: as a
> > > consequence, I think this bug report may be safely closed as fixed.
> >
> > Doing so with this mail.
>
> I am reopening this bug report, since it seems to me that the bug
> history graphs, although regenerated daily, get out-of-date data, not
> in sync with the packages.qa.debian.org summary.
>
> For example: a new minor bug was filed against apt-listbugs on Wed, 10
> Feb 2010 21:11:15 +0100, bringing the total number of bugs from 20 to
> 21.
> The packages.qa.debian.org summary changed on thursday morning, but the
> history graph (the one generated on 11-Feb-2010 12:29) still said 20
> bugs.
> Today the history graph (generated on 12-Feb-2010 12:30) says 21 bugs,
> as it should.
>
> I noticed the same behavior in other cases, with other packages: the
> graphs were updated with a two days delay (or even more).
>
> However it is my understanding that the graphs are regenerated daily.
>
> What's wrong?
> Are graphs generated on the basis of out-of-date data?
> Is there anything I failed to understand?
As I said earlier, the RRD files are not properly configured, and
aggregation doesn't allow for quick updates of the bug numbers.
Mike
Reply to: