[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#562175: qa.debian.org: QA Webpage: please link to specific information about MIA



Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Heyho!

This has bitten me twice, and I only remembered when it happened the second
time (but didn't remember where I found the information in the end...)

MIA is part of QA, so I logically go to http://qa.debian.org/ first.  But there
is no further information (which email address to use?)

The information is contained in various places, but IMO not where it is most
obvious to look for it.  So please add a link from http://qa.debian.org/ to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/MIATeam

(I guess you could also just redirect http://qa.debian.org/ to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/ and avoid having part of the information
duplicated.  Yes, the link is already there as a link, but I don't think it's
obvious enough.  And the process of "find MIA description on qa.d.o page,
wonder why there isn't more, notice that there's a link to the Wiki, find MIA
mentioned on wiki.d.o QA page, navigate to MIA page" is quite a bit more
complicated than necessary. And it's not foolprof; I failed at the "notice the link to the Wiki" stage. :-/  )

thank you
- -- vbi

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (150, 'stable'), (60, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481

iKcEARECAGcFAksyFFhgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6aqAAnik/wsAWRGGNn8tn5HmApRl1
M9VRAKCatep3soEG/1T20b1BDR+H1tLf8Q==
=xR4O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: