Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)

To: debian-med@lists.debian.org, Debian QA List <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)
From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:48 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20091026150048.GC876@kunpuu.plessy.org>
In-reply-to: <20091026145532.GA6594@plessy.org> <[🔎] 20091022074910.GA20846@an3as.eu>
References: <20081007205357.GA1582@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <20081008002713.GA29164@kunpuu.plessy.org> <20091026145532.GA6594@plessy.org> <4A7309D8.9010706@gmx.de> <20090803182130.GC975@an3as.eu> <20090805023802.GA22086@kunpuu.plessy.org> <20090805072124.GB16430@an3as.eu> <4A795981.7000606@gmx.de> <20091021153006.GA28743@kunpuu.plessy.org> <[🔎] 20091022074910.GA20846@an3as.eu>

Le Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:49:10AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> 
> BTW, I'm a bit concerned about mixing different database formats: On one
> hand you are using yaml on the other hand BibTeX.  Well, for sure having
> a BibTeX record is very valuable.  But on the other hand the tools who
> are working with this data will need a BibTeX parser.  I did not dived
> into this and for sure it is doable - but I just wanted to raise this
> topic here to hear opinions.

Hi Andreas and all,

since BibTeX issues are perhaps a bit specialised for debian-qa, I propose to
transfer this part of the discussion on debian-science@l.d.o, where I reopened
an old thread.

http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20091026145532.GA6594@plessy.org

have a nice day,

-- 
Charles

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

References:
- Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)
Next by Date: Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)
Previous by thread: Using RDF and ontologies for such metadata (combined DOAP and other ontologies) Was: Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)
Next by thread: Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread