Bug#460983: marked as done (PTS: Please link to Security Tracker)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:50:07 +0000
with message-id <E1MqtOJ-0005iF-D9@alioth.debian.org>
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2277
has caused the Debian Bug report #460983,
regarding PTS: Please link to Security Tracker
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
460983: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460983
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Cc: fw@deneb.enyo.de
- Subject: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker
- From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:19:29 +0100
- Message-id: <20080115231929.4538.8274.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
It would be good if the PTS would link to the Debian Security Tracker.
The URL format is
http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/SRCPKGNAME
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-rc7-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2277
This bug was closed by Raphael Geissert (geissert) in SVN revision 2277.
Note that it might take some time until the qa.debian.org code has
been updated and cronjobs have picked up changed data.
Commit message:
Know and warn about open security issues (Closes: #460983)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: