Re: UDD schema for new queue
On 16/02/09 at 10:15 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> Or should we rather start to just move the information of
>>> into UDD for the moment and "wait".
>> Yeah, it would make sense to:
>> - add all the info from new.822 to UDD
>> - file a bug about exporting the other missing info through new.822
>> - have your script warn you when new fields are available in new.822.
> Seems to be a reasonable plan. Do you think we should stick to my
> propsed table layout format  for the moment even if not all fields
> will be filled or would you go with a reduced table layout which
> reflects the information in new.822?
As you want. You write the code, you choose. :-)
| Lucas Nussbaum
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: email@example.com GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |