[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: alsa-lib qa-doublebuild release goal in lenny



severity 505088 important
thanks

Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> writes:
> Maintainer has put it to severity "minor" (not sure why: because it
> applies only to nanosecond timestamp filesystems? because he thought
> it did not apply to the version in lenny?), which I consider too
> low. Not entering BTS ping-pong, but if the release team agrees with
> me (it is a "confirmed" release goal according to
> http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt), please say so. I'd be
> glad to do an NMU if that's appreciated / necessary / ..., but:
>  - when the maintainer considers it "minor", I feel I need strong
>    reasons to do it
>  - at this point I'm not sure if we are supposed to do it only for RC
>    bugs or also for release goals. 

Only for RC bugs, so please don't NMU.

I think we will just add the doublebuild thing to the release goals for
squeeze (though mandating an idempotent build process would be something
for the policy in general), so this bug is at least important.

Marc
-- 
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
245: Stockoptions
       Die Geschäftsleitung behält sich vor, die Prügelstrafe
       einzuführen. (Manfred Worm Schäfer)

Attachment: pgpBb5DN8AjdI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: