Re: [RFS] QA upload of ncpfs merging all Ubuntu changes
- To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [RFS] QA upload of ncpfs merging all Ubuntu changes
- From: James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:42:03 +0000
- Message-id: <1232041323.6812.233.camel@flash>
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901151712000.28989@wr-linux02>
- References: <1232031945.6812.229.camel@flash> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901151712000.28989@wr-linux02>
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
>
> > Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
> > is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
> > kindly review and sponsor my package at
> >
> > http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
> >
> > I haven't been able to test it in action though, so if anyone has the
> > capability then I would greatly appreciate that.
>
> I could sponsor an upload but I wonder if you might like to fix the following
> lintian issues first:
Hi,
I saw these, but I didn't deem them worth the effort.
>
> E: ncpfs source: outdated-autotools-helper-file contrib/php/config.sub 2003-10-07
> E: ncpfs source: outdated-autotools-helper-file contrib/php/config.guess 2003-10-07
These I should have fixed I realise.
> W: ncpfs: binary-without-manpage sbin/mount.ncpfs
This is like a private helper isn't it?
> W: ncpfs: setuid-binary usr/bin/ncpmount 4755 root/root
> W: ncpfs: setuid-binary usr/bin/ncpumount 4755 root/root
> W: ncpfs: setuid-binary usr/bin/nwsfind 4755 root/root
Unavoidable. I can add overrides if you like.
> W: ncpfs: syntax-error-in-debian-changelog line 483 "badly formatted trailer line"
> W: ncpfs: syntax-error-in-debian-changelog line 485 "found start of entry where expected more change data or trailer"
> W: ncpfs: syntax-error-in-debian-changelog line 492 "badly formatted trailer line"
> W: ncpfs: syntax-error-in-debian-changelog line 494 "found start of entry where expected more change data or trailer"
The first 3 changelog entries have no date. I could manufacture a date,
but that seems wrong.
Thanks,
James
Reply to: