Better team maintenance of orphaned packages (Was: Bug#492503: marked as done (ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer))
- To: Debian Quality Assurance Team <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Better team maintenance of orphaned packages (Was: Bug#492503: marked as done (ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer))
- From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:32:04 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.10.0808260921080.3864@wr-linux02>
- In-reply-to: <handler.492503.D492503.12197340986049.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
- References: <E1KXsKV-0005ZX-7o@ries.debian.org> <cd6061db0807261043u1cf6840o284567b886941474@mail.gmail.com> <handler.492503.D492503.12197340986049.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:47:03 +0000
with message-id <E1KXsKV-0005ZX-7o@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#492503: fixed in feh 1.3.4.dfsg.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #492503,
regarding ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer
to be marked as done.
At DebConf I learned about the existence of the nice wnpp-alert script.
It is a real shame that this script is somehow hidden below the "noise"
of many other nice scripts. So I easily detected a set of packages I
would really like to keep in good shape because my day to day work depends
from them.
My first target was the image viewer feh. As you see I just took over
this package but my experience in several teams has shown that it is
much better to find a team which uses a common repository for packaging
issues. Unfortunately I can not easily find an appropriate team for
this package. In the end I could imagine a Debian Imaging DIS
(Debian Integrated Solution - formerly known as CDD, but renamed since
DebConf). But it would kind of overkill to start a new project for
this - I feel the need for such an effort, but I can not do it myself.
And finally it would not help for my next target gcal - I also would
fail to find a reasonable team.
So my question is: Do you think it makes sense to create a VCS on Alioth
where we could build a pool for those packages that are orphaned or just
taken over and do not find a better home. I would feel much better if
my packaging stuff would not reside only on my local disk but in a
commonly accessible VCS and the location to this VCS is clearly mentioned
in the VCS fields of the control file.
Any opinions
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: