On 26/04/08 at 17:48 +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:56:47AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Yes, I think so, but it's not clear when debcheck or edos-debcheck > > should be the recommended tool. > > FWIW, I don't know if debcheck has a main page, but the various EDOS > tools have one (http://edos.debian.net) and a few days ago I added a > link to it to the wiki page of QA. If debcheck has a main page it does > make sense to link to it as well from the wiki page. I added a link to http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php on the wiki page. It would be great if someone could rework the design of this page a bit, btw. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature