[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#477430: marked as done (DDPO: Split package got lost)



Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:22:03 +0200
with message-id <20080423152203.GK6024@mail-vs.djpig.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#477430: DDPO: Split package got lost
has caused the Debian Bug report #477430,
regarding DDPO: Split package got lost
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
477430: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477430
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Tags: ddpo

ekg (ekg,libgadu3,libgadu-dev) was recently split into ekg (ekg) and
libgadu (libgadu3, libgadu-dev, libgadu-dbg).

As long as libgadu was still in NEW, it was visible in
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=porridge&comaint=yes

But now that it's been accepted, it's not there.

-- 
Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>             http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216  FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:18:17AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> ekg (ekg,libgadu3,libgadu-dev) was recently split into ekg (ekg) and
> libgadu (libgadu3, libgadu-dev, libgadu-dbg).
> 
> As long as libgadu was still in NEW, it was visible in
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=porridge&comaint=yes
> 
> But now that it's been accepted, it's not there.

I can verify that libgadu didn't show up on DDPO (or packages.d.o)
this morning, but that was because it wasn't listed in the Sources file.
After the midday dinstall run it is now and DDPO displays it just fine.

So if there was a problem, it was definetly on the side of
ftp-master and/or an outdated mirror.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: