-=| Frank Lichtenheld, Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:58:50PM +0100 |=- > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > >The whole OPTIMIZE stuff seems unneccessary, since this is an Arch: all > > >package. > > I thought so too but it's on the policy page. Should I go ahead and > > remove it anyway? Which policy is that? It needs a bug report if it requires OPTIMIZE for arch:all packages. > The policy example doesn't handle noopt correctly and you corrected > that. So you too seem to think that the policy is not everything ;) > > Creating completly unused code just for the sake of it is never a good > idea in my book. I would still advide to remove it. > > Does anyone on debian-perl disagree? I routinely remove unneeded OPTIMIZE setting. I can't tell I am stripping *all* of the redundant bits of the packaging, but since OPTIMIZE is so clearly unneeded and so easy to spot, it is an easy target. -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature