[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#466515: PTS: "you should include ."



On ti, 2008-02-19 at 14:14 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:55, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > On ti, 2008-02-19 at 11:23 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > And as this isn't always right, I suggest to use a less strong wording.
> > > "You should look at.." or "You could include". Or whatever. But _all_
> > > those patches should definitly _not_ be included.
> >
> > I concur, although I suggest that the wording could say that if the
> > patch is inappropriate, the patch tag should be removed.
> 
> I've changed the patch to replace "you should include it/them" with "consider 
> including it/them".
> 
> Regarding Lars' remark: the ways to express that I can think of make the text 
> considerably longer and hence IMHO out of place in the PTS, which should be a 
> concise overview of a package, not a detailed instruction of what to do. :-)

Perhaps "The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 3 bugs, you
should consider including or untagging them." then? Two additional
words. :)






Reply to: