Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Cc: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Justin Pryzby <jpryzby+d@quoininc.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:10:18 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080102201018.GA24070@quoininc.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080102200444.GB4997@artemis.madism.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20080102200444.GB4997@artemis.madism.org>

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:04:44PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
> >    libgss-dbg (U)
> >    shishi-dbg (U)
> 
> rriiiight...
Those are buggy AFAICT not due to being arch:all, but due to a missing
Depends:libX-dev $(= Source:Version).

Justin

Reply to:

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread