On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:28:17 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > That's going to be a lot of fairly mindless paperwork for someone who's
> > the member of a large, active team with a lot of packages.
> Agreed. I'm not sure what's the best way to handle this.
> Maybe the form should make it easy to give the same answers to all
> packages that are maintained by a given team ?
An option for setting values for all packages would be nice (and
maybe not only for team-maintained packages).
> Another answer might be to hide all packages which are fine under the
> current norms (to be defined: no bugs (or less than X bugs), no lintian
> errors, ???) and use some predefined answers in those cases. The form would
> focus on packages with problems (or that are getting worse over time).
I think hiding kind of defeats the purpose of the idea :)
But setting sane default values based on some metrics would make it
easier indeed.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Paul Simon: The Obvious Child
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature