[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#486315: marked as done (PTS: resets bug counts)



Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:37:05 +0200
with message-id <20080615163705.GC7887@ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#486315: PTS: resets bug counts
has caused the Debian Bug report #486315,
regarding PTS: resets bug counts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
486315: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=486315
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org

The bug counts for all packages in the PTS seem to be all-zeroes. My first
explanation for this is the current outage of a number of Debian machines.
However, I think it would be better if the PTS did not trash the old
information it has before it knows it downloaded new fresh information.


cheers,
Thijs




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Package: qa.debian.org
> > 
> > The bug counts for all packages in the PTS seem to be all-zeroes. My first
> > explanation for this is the current outage of a number of Debian machines.
> > However, I think it would be better if the PTS did not trash the old
> > information it has before it knows it downloaded new fresh information.
> 
> agreed, I just committed a fix to update_incoming.sh which should solve this
> bug.

I confirm it's fixed. Closing now.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: