double-build issues, take 2
Hi,
I removed the build logs for the double-build tests by mistake, so I
re-ran all the builds.
This time, I commited the lists of failures to the collab-qa repository,
under:
collab-qa/archive-rebuilds/2007-09-05-doublebuild-unstable-main-i386
there are four lists:
failed-build-1.txt (534 packages):
packages that failed during the first build. Those should probably be
ignored, as they are taken care of during the "normal" rebuilds
failed-build-2.txt (371 packages):
packages which failed during their second build.
failed-build-3.txt (9 packages):
packages that failed during their third build.
failed-debdiff.txt (45 packages):
packages that built fine three times in a row, but which generated
files that were different from those generated when built only one
time (according to debdiff). Like added files, removed files, etc.
Those issues are probably severity:serious, since it might cause the
silent generation of bogus packages. Also, there are some false
positives, with packages that generate documentation in a
non-deterministic way.
All the logs are available under
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/doublebuild-09-05/
A follow-up should probably be sent to all bug reports already opened[1],
mentioning the new location for the logs, and some additional info
(links to the relevant thread on -devel@, mention that the bug is
subject to 0-day NMUs since it's a release goal, etc).
And there's also a lot of new bugs to file. I think we should use the
"normal" collab-qa procedure, modifying the lists in svn. This would
make it easier if we do a third pass on this issue.
Any comments?
Ah, and I also commited "normal" rebuild results in
2007-09-05-unstable-main-i386. There are quite a lot of bugs to file, so
if you have some free time ... :-)
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=qa-doublebuild;users=debian-qa@lists.debian.org
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: