Re: Suggesstion to remove lxdoom
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:13:51PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tuesday 7 August 2007 01:24, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > I've seen that lxdoom has been orphaned. It can be safely removed:
> > While lxdoom is completely dead upstream, we have a cleaned-up
> > fork of lxdoom in the archive, which is actively maintained: prboom.
>
> Is it a drop in replacement? Then we could make it a transional package.
AFAICS, yet. But let's ask Jon, the current maintainer. CCing him.
Cheers,
Moritz
Reply to: