[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFO: crystalspace, RC buggy > 1yr w/patch, not in oldstable/stable



crystalspace has been failing to build on alpha for > 1yr, even though a
patch has been available in the BTS for 6 months today.  Previous versions
of the package built fine on all architectures, making this a serious
regression and preventing the package's inclusion in a stable release (or in
testing).

Christian, are you still interested in maintaining this package, or should
it be orphaned/removed from the archive (along with crystalspace-data)?

If there's a reason the package should not be orphaned, I can do an NMU for
bug #358044 (and 399843) as previously suggested (by someone who apparently
wasn't a DD), but if the package isn't actually being maintained I'd rather
not fix these bugs just to clear the way for an unmaintained package to
enter testing.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: