On 07/03/07 at 21:29 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:09:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > I think that it's important to make that server-side, so the information > > is "pushed" to the developers. With a client-side implementation, most > > developers won't use it. > > A server side implementation is going to be pretty easy to ignore too: > even if one doesn't killfile them automated e-mails often end up being > things that are deleted unread based on the subject. If it doesn't do > opt in it's also likely to wind some people up, especially people who > keep on top of these things already. Of course, but if those mails: - stay useful - provide an unsubscription mechanism I think the win outweights the loss, don't you ? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature