[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#393462: marked as done (PTS: please make VCS link also point to browsable copy)



Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:53:10 +0100
with message-id <20070223085310.GA31461@takhisis.invalid>
and subject line Bug#393462: PTS: please make VCS link also point to browsable copy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

The latest addition to the PTS, showing VCS repositories for packages,
is a great addition. However, I'd like it even better if there was also
a link to a web browsable copy of the repository.

There's currently also a link to the upstream website of the used
vcs (e.g. http://subversion.tigris.org). I don't think that link is very
useful (and if it's really needed, a link to the Debian package would be
more logical). That link could then disappear to make room for the
feature above.

Please consider, thanks,
Thijs


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 09:56:09AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> tags 393462 + patch
> thanks

A couple of days ago Filippo applied the patch. The bug is now closed.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: