Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:59:29 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060313155929.GA20264@rivendell.ouaza.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87hd621vjt.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
References: <[🔎] 87hd621vjt.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote:
> retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
> reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org
> block 202764 by 275774
> block 356098 by 275774

Is this a new policy to block (RC) bug by the request of removal bug ?

I find this rather strange ... why not simply CC the bug greports so
that anyone trying to fix it will discover that the package is in the
process of being removed ?

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
  - From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
- Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
  - From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>

References:
- RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
  - From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#311964: How to handle pseudo packages
Next by Date: Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
Previous by thread: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
Next by thread: Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread