Re: No reasonable solution
* Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> [2006-12-24 14:30]:
> For my part, I've never heard of slang-slirp before, and it seems obvious to
> me from the naming prefix that the slirp package does have prior claim to
> the name. I think this just needs to be resolved by slang-slirp changing
> its binary name the same way as the package name.
This is what I did in version 1.9.0.3-2 of slang-slirp uploaded yesterday,
which closed Bug#404009. This bug report can be closed as well, although
the bug persists in etch.
--
Rafael
Reply to: