Update on orphaned packages with very low popcon numbers
Revisiting http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/09/msg00013.html .
Some have been ITAed or adopted and are removed from the list. :-)
Others have been removed from Debian or removal requests filed (some by me)
and are likewise removed from the list. :-)
It looks like we could use a Korean-speaking maintainer for hanterm-xf
and manpages-ko.
eco5000: 11
hanterm-xf: 22 (10 votes)
libbusiness-ups-perl: 17 (3 votes)
libsufary-ruby: 15
manpages-fi: 16
-- upstream is DEAD. What to do?
manpages-ko: 16
-- upstream appears active, but it's all Korean to me
manued-el: 13
mmx-emu: 5 (3 votes)
-- examples don't compile -- worthless?
nbio: 10
njbtools: 12 (1 vote)
openverse: 9 (6 votes)
php4-tclink: 7
python-tclink: 7
rscheme: 22 (6 votes)
-- upstream may be dead?
sctplib: 8 (1 vote)
skinedit: 13 (5 votes)
slbreflex: 3
socketapi: 5
sppc: 19 (5 votes)
swingwt: 10 (4 votes)
-- kicked out of testing
tela: 27 (9 votes)
tidev-modules: 33 (8 votes)
ts10: 26 (6 votes)
x10-automate: 16 (6 votes)
xbox-raincoat: 3 (2 votes)
xgdipc: 10 (2 votes)
xiterm+thai: 10 (5 votes)
In "contrib":
gkrelldnet: 14
In "non-free":
qla2x00: 11 (4 votes)
-- this should be expected to have low popcon counts.
But if nobody cares enough to fix the bugs (I don't),
removal should be requested: it is non-free, after all.
Reply to: