Re: Help transition to gettext 0.15
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 07:52:39PM -0300, Damián Viano wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:28:31PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > gettext 0.15 causes several FTBFS, for different reasons. In
> > order to find all problems and to provide fixes, it would help
> > to know which packages FTBFS, with build logs. Could someone
> > rebuild all packages which Build-Depends{,-Indep}: gettext?
> > I have no hardware to do this myself. Thanks in advance.
>
> Hi, I've done this already, and also filled bugs (with some patches) for
> the FTBFS I've found.
>
> I'm uploading my results here http://lug.fi.uba.ar/~des/gettext_0.15/
>
> There you will find:
>
> - rdep: list of packages rebuilt
> - results: results for the first run (0 success, other failure)
> - results_rebuilt: results for the re-run
> - buildlogs/package.log: package build log
> - buildlogs/package_rebuild.log: package re-run build log
> - gtt15.tar.bz2: tarball with all the above
>
> All the packages where built on *the same* pbuilder environment, so it
> was not-so-clean, but I guess that it represent a decent build
> environment.
Thanks, but there are several problems:
* Your pbuilder environment is not clean, so you were not able
to build packages which Build-Conflicts any flavour of automake,
like gtoaster.
* Due to this unclean environment, bugs are somewhat hidden because
the aclocal command is the one you selected by alternatives, and
may be different from the one specified in Build-Depends{,-Indep};
for instance I do not see how your patch in #386072 can work, since
you modify lines after aclocal is called, and this is this command
which fails.
* You did not rebuild packages which Build-Depends-Indep: gettext
It would IMO be nice to rebuild packages in a clean environment; I put
the list of packages at http://people.debian.org/~barbier/tmp/gettext.list
if someone can rebuild these packages.
> The bugs I've seen from this rebuilt are mostly 3:
> - #386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not
> defined
> - #385235: gettext 0.15 causes build failures in multiple packages
> - some about @MKINSTALLDIRS@ failures, which was previously being
> defined in AM_GNU_GETTEXT and now it's not
Yes it seems that there are very few bugs, this is good news.
Did you file bugs for all the failures you found?
Thanks.
Denis
Reply to: