Re: RM: dcl -- RoQA; orphaned for 600+ days, buggy
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:07:11AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
>> I think we should remove dcl.
>> * Orphaned for 1 year and 320 days.
>> * 9 outstanding bugs.
> None of these bugs are higher than severity: important. Is "buggy" really a
> factor in removing this package?
Well, some of those bugs looked like they might warrant "serious", but
I didn't look harder because the package's been orphaned for so long.