Bug#316508: marked as done (DDPO: fails for someone who exclusively co-maintains)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:41:32 +0100
with message-id <20060120124132.GA10800@intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de>
and subject line DDPO: fails for someone who exclusively co-maintains
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2005 13:00:38 +0000
>From kink@squirrelmail.org Fri Jul 01 06:00:38 2005
Return-path: <kink@squirrelmail.org>
Received: from mail.azu.nl (davis.azu.nl) [143.121.237.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DoL8I-00074z-00; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 06:00:38 -0700
Received: from coltrane.azu.nl (coltrane.azu.nl [143.121.16.65])
by davis.azu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA493DBE
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:00:05 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from isiwww.rrn.azu.nl (unknown [143.121.62.57])
by coltrane.azu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FADB1148
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:00:05 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [143.121.153.52] (zoltrix.rrn.azu.nl [143.121.153.52])
by isiwww.rrn.azu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C676F1B82A
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 14:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <42C53E52.7020209@squirrelmail.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:00:02 +0200
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org>
Organization: University Medical Center, Utrecht NL
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: DDPO: fails for someone who exclusively co-maintains
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enigC581152CDE9015EAB03DEB0F"
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC581152CDE9015EAB03DEB0F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: qa.debian.org
Hello,
If someone is exclusively a co-maintainer of packages, so he only
populates the Uploaders field of some packages but never the Maintainer
field, he does not have a functional DDPO page.
See for example Allard Hoeve, he is an Uploader on some packages (where
Maintainer is set to Debian Perl Group), e.g.:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libf/libfile-touch-perl.html
Clicking his name yields a "No information available for" message (which
itself could also be fixed: no information for whom/what?).
regards,
Thijs Kinkhorst
--------------enigC581152CDE9015EAB03DEB0F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCxT5VJdKMxZV9WM8RApZMAJ0XUZPNG0ksmPCyLaRMPI/X2u8R1ACfblpY
NKg8sk1NKqBNaKuK4te7FIk=
=zHAh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigC581152CDE9015EAB03DEB0F--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316508-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 12:41:35 +0000
>From cb@intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de Fri Jan 20 04:41:34 2006
Return-path: <cb@intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de>
Received: from uni-sb.de ([134.96.252.33])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzvaA-0004Aa-Ft
for 316508-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:41:34 -0800
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by uni-sb.de (8.13.5/2006010500) with ESMTP id k0KCfWGI025707
for <316508-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:41:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de (intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.241.4])
by mail.cs.uni-sb.de (8.13.5/2006010200) with ESMTP id k0KCfWMC025678
for <316508-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:41:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 30D434A77A; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:41:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:41:32 +0100
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: 316508-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: DDPO: fails for someone who exclusively co-maintains
Message-ID: <20060120124132.GA10800@intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>,
316508-done@bugs.debian.org
References: <42C53E52.7020209@squirrelmail.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42C53E52.7020209@squirrelmail.org>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
X-Face: (nN@x(D\O)J!Qu\q4fh8W^7WGqxpwTk&Xy0*ya<z@L`gg26[[T%n/TA:l\Pde>wYj,M;75" N13_k}S.rS#lmX[G]QOuw[H"4#z$tSn$SkV<IurN'6;gkRFZw@/XLtl7":0v&kN3*-iM~q*;.*CfH@ qM>5ucV193Tz3IWj<]8at(6"K.ht//s"Ds,xMV9A\_bN/)w@^PmEM>-dF34Kw?,<G0ya
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Re: Thijs Kinkhorst in <42C53E52.7020209@squirrelmail.org>
> If someone is exclusively a co-maintainer of packages, so he only
> populates the Uploaders field of some packages but never the Maintainer
> field, he does not have a functional DDPO page.
Hi,
this was due to the fact that DDPO got its list of maintainers from
the indices/Maintainers file on ftp.d.o. Since it already parses the
Sources files, I've patched ddpo.py to also extract all Uploaders.
Christoph
--=20
cb@cs.uni-sb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/cs/
Universit=E4t des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD0Np7xa93SlhRC1oRAjSFAKD7dyMcY/+L+MuAlOe7roeI/vr09gCfcEy6
loTLr+Mm9I+tbI4oea7D/Ig=
=Xjai
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--
Reply to: