Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable
- To: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bao@debian.org, bcollins@debian.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, cts@debian.org, guillem@debian.org, pfaffben@debian.org, robin@debian.org, smr@debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable
- From: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:02:29 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20051116160229.GB7425@gleep.debian.net>
- Mail-followup-to: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bao@debian.org, bcollins@debian.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, guillem@debian.org, pfaffben@debian.org, robin@debian.org, smr@debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051115170006.GB5615@hattusa.textio>
- References: <[🔎] 20051115170006.GB5615@hattusa.textio>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> Replacement (2.6 Kernel) in the works, should be removed once 2.6 is
> stable enough:
>
> Christian T. Steigies <cts@debian.org>
> kernel-image-2.4.27-m68k Build-Depends: gcc-2.95
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-m68k Build-Depends-Indep: gcc-2.95
It might take a while until 2.6 kernels can fully replace 2.4 (and 2.2!)
kernels on m68k. Half of our buildds can not be installed with a 2.6 kernel
at the moment. But people are working on it.
Until then we need 2.4 on m68k, however I just (cross-)compiled 2.4.27 with
gcc-3.3 with no problems. Since the 2.6 kernels are already built with
gcc-3.3, 2.4 might actually work with gcc-3.3 also, I will give it a try and
let you know.
Christian
Reply to: