Bug#326729: marked as done (Where should problems with the qa.debian.org web site be reported?)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:26:01 +0100
with message-id <20051030222601.GA22742@df7cb.de>
and subject line Where should problems with the qa.debian.org web site be reported?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 11:35:51 +0000
>From pre@diskless.uio.no Mon Sep 05 04:35:51 2005
Return-path: <pre@diskless.uio.no>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECFGR-0000tk-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:35:51 -0700
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ECFGM-000734-Sx
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:35:46 +0200
Received: from diskless.uio.no ([129.240.186.27])
by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ECFGC-0001LG-Kt; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:35:36 +0200
Received: from pre by diskless.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1ECFGC-00011J-Ja; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:35:36 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Where should problems with the qa.debian.org web site be reported?
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E1ECFGC-00011J-Ja@diskless.uio.no>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:35:36 +0200
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.596, required 12,
autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL 2.22,
UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
On <URL:http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clanlib.html>, "Report
problems to the qa.debian.org pseudopackage" is written in the footer.
This is not written on
<URL:http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pere@debian.org>. Does
this mean that problems with the latter should be send somewhere else?
If bugs and wishes for the latter should be sent to the BTS as well,
please add information about this at the footer of the package list as
well.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326729-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 22:26:06 +0000
>From cb@df7cb.de Sun Oct 30 14:26:06 2005
Return-path: <cb@df7cb.de>
Received: from meitner.df7cb.de [217.160.132.97] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EWLcp-0002Vz-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:26:04 -0800
Received: from volta.df7cb.de (dslb-084-058-194-060.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.58.194.60])
by meitner.df7cb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1289420C02E
for <326729-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:26:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by volta.df7cb.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4CDB343063; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:26:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:26:01 +0100
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: 326729-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Where should problems with the qa.debian.org web site be reported?
Message-ID: <20051030222601.GA22742@df7cb.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>,
326729-done@bugs.debian.org
References: <E1ECFGC-00011J-Ja@diskless.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1ECFGC-00011J-Ja@diskless.uio.no>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
X-Face: (nN@x(D\O)J!Qu\q4fh8W^7WGqxpwTk&Xy0*ya<z@L`gg26[[T%n/TA:l\Pde>wYj,M;75" N13_k}S.rS#lmX[G]QOuw[H"4#z$tSn$SkV<IurN'6;gkRFZw@/XLtl7":0v&kN3*-iM~q*;.*CfH@ qM>5ucV193Tz3IWj<]8at(6"K.ht//s"Ds,xMV9A\_bN/)w@^PmEM>-dF34Kw?,<G0ya
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 326729-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Re: Petter Reinholdtsen in <E1ECFGC-00011J-Ja@diskless.uio.no>
> On <URL:http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clanlib.html>, "Report
> problems to the qa.debian.org pseudopackage" is written in the footer.
> This is not written on
> <URL:http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dpere@debian.org>. Does
> this mean that problems with the latter should be send somewhere else?
>=20
> If bugs and wishes for the latter should be sent to the BTS as well,
> please add information about this at the footer of the package list as
> well.
Fixed.
Christoph
--=20
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDZUh5xa93SlhRC1oRAiiFAKDz5ubNkXYbBKF6CXKbiJYYZ1xguwCfTeeb
iIzF3tqxyYSGhA05YzLrb8I=
=BgIE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--
Reply to: