Re: The PTS should list Ubuntu patches
* Santiago Vila (sanvila@unex.es) [050720 12:45]:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > * Raphael Hertzog (raphael@ouaza.com) [050720 00:26]:
> > > Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 11:46 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > > > Why are changes made by one particular derived debian distribution so
> > > > important that they should be singled out by the PTS?
> >
> > > Because they're doing a good job and because those changes are done by
> > > DD ... and because the interest of both parties is to integrate their
> > > changes when it makes sense.
> >
> > well, but these patches should go into the debian BTS then. [...]
> No, just because there is an Ubuntu patch does not mean the patch
> should be in the BTS (there may be other reasons, but the mere
> existence of an Ubuntu patch should not be the only one).
>
> It should not be a bug to do things differently than Ubuntu.
Agreed. But - when they are just done differently, there is no reason to
listen them in the PTS. If they are valuable and should be picked up,
they should be in BTS.
Cheers,
Andi
Reply to: