Bug#298030: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: remove pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}: orphaned, non-free)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:50:04 +0100
with message-id <200503301650.17192@fortytwo.ch>
and subject line remove pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}: orphaned, non-free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 08:00:46 +0000
>From avbidder@fortytwo.ch Fri Mar 04 00:00:46 2005
Return-path: <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch [193.138.215.60]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D77jq-0002VI-00; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:46 -0800
Received: from gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (zux221-090-079.adsl.green.ch [81.221.90.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "gluggsi.fortytwo.ch", Issuer "fortytwo.ch - MAIL CA" (verified OK))
by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8707E233
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:00:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from altfrangg.fortytwo.ch (altfrangg.fortytwo.ch [192.168.1.17])
by gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBBA98F8D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:00:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by altfrangg.fortytwo.ch (Postfix, from userid 1002)
id 56F0ABB3B2; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:00:43 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ftp.debian.org: remove pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}: orphaned, non-free
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:00:42 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <20050304080043.56F0ABB3B2@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed the pdp1=C2=A7-unix-v{5,6,7} images - how useful are they reall=
y?
popcon suggests that only a few people have installed them.
Since Kevin now orphaned them and they are non-free, can we get rid of
them? If someobody should find them useful beyond archeological
interest, it's always possible to fetch them from snapshot.d.n
greetings
- -- vbi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
iKcEARECAGcFAkIoFapgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJEIukMYvlp/fWUtcAoL9C/hqfr+UGsWoVmKOTFzGK
MhjwAKCFPDfnT7Gb1iRz5cd51n0Vyx6W6w=3D=3D
=3DLp+N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298030-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 14:50:22 +0000
>From avbidder@fortytwo.ch Wed Mar 30 06:50:22 2005
Return-path: <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch [193.138.215.60]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGeWT-000173-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:50:21 -0800
Received: from gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (zux221-090-079.adsl.green.ch [81.221.90.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "gluggsi.fortytwo.ch", Issuer "fortytwo.ch - MAIL CA" (verified OK))
by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0FE150;
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:50:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from altfrangg.fortytwo.ch (unknown [192.168.1.17])
by gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6056298F8E;
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:50:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Subject: Re: remove pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}: orphaned, non-free
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:50:04 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
Cc: 298030-done@bugs.debian.org, 297437@bugs.debian.org,
297438@bugs.debian.org, 297440@bugs.debian.org,
control@bugs.debian.org
References: <20050304080043.56F0ABB3B2@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch> <[🔎] 200503161433.16317@fortytwo.ch> <[🔎] 20050316133729.GQ2772@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050316133729.GQ2772@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
X-KMail-CryptoFormat: 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-UID: 4518
X-Length: 2364
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart4885968.Z4af3FHuiL";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200503301650.17192@fortytwo.ch>
Delivered-To: 298030-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
--nextPart4885968.Z4af3FHuiL
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
retitle 297437 RM: pdp11-unix-v5 -- orphaned, non-free, virtually unused
retitle 297438 RM: pdp11-unix-v6 -- orphaned, non-free, virtually unused
retitle 297440 RM: pdp11-unix-v7 -- orphaned, non-free, virtually unused
reassign 297437 ftp.debian.org
reassign 297438 ftp.debian.org
reassign 297440 ftp.debian.org
thanks
As stated, Kevin recently orphaned these non-free packages.
Additionally, popcon shows almost no use, a query on d-devel brought exactl=
y=20
zero responses, a query on IRC brought a 'go for it' (not that this says=20
much).
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 14.37, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > So I close this (298030) bug and retitle/reassign the wnpp ones now?=20
> > Wait any longer?
>
> d-d isn't usefully archived (that is, per issue), like a buglog is, for
> later review by QA and afterwards FTP-team.
>
> Yeah, retitle & reassign the wnpp would be best, supplying a reason.
Ok, I hope this does what I want the way you (QA) want it. =20
The delay was: because snapshots.d.n doesn't archive non-free, I sent the=20
question about removals additionally to all people who previously=20
maintained the packages or filed bugs against it (4 people or so). 2 of the=
=20
email addresses bounced, the others didn't react in the last 10 days.
greetings
=2D- vbi
=2D-=20
Die Zukunft kann man am besten voraussagen, indem man sie selbst
gestaltet.
-- Alan Kay
--nextPart4885968.Z4af3FHuiL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
iKcEABECAGcFAkJKvKlgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJEIukMYvlp/fWxsYAoO3/Zf9XUuU7mQZx+iPnm8+p
1IlOAJ4v1v9rYKq0amMLNjPOPpoPv+tyTg==
=nnwV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart4885968.Z4af3FHuiL--
Reply to: