On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:08, Dave Harding wrote: > In brief, I don't think http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html , > which is a listing of missing man pages is acurately reflecting the > lintian report at: > http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tbinary-without-manpage.html What does the man-pages.html page do what the lintian page doesn't, except providing some extra instructions? If the lintian report seems the (most) correct source and the man-pages.html page is not accurate, why not take the lintian report as the place to look for packages to write a man page for? Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part