Re: Candidates for removal
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:05:08AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> These packages are candidates for removal
> 1671 days: scandetd (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Bradley Alexander]
> Potential removal bug already filed by Marc Brockschmidt more than 7 days
> ago. Is it OK to reassign it to ftp.debian.org now?
Huh. I have this installed, and it does useful things for me. I'd be
willing to maintain this, if its available for the taking, even to the
point of becoming upstream; looks like a simple piece of code (single
1000 line source file).
If anyone knows of a (technical) reason I shouldn't do this .. step
forwards now. Otherwise, has anyone been in contact with Bradley?
> --
> This raised the issue of scm, which is "maintained" by James LewisMoss
> <dres@debian.org>, and is quite seriously suffering from FTBFS bugs.
> scm is a good candidate for a forced orphaning -- perhaps someone could file
> a 7-day-warning bug?
>
> Oddly, when I look up dres@debian.org (on
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=dres@debian.org), it thinks
> his name is Takashi Okamoto. Something is broken here.
> --
Do you want to file a bug or should I?
> 1057 days: chdrv (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Anthony Fok]
> 8 popcon users, 7 old.
> Good old MIA Anthony Fok. 3-year-old grave bug. Should be removed.
Has anyone been in contact with Anthony?
--
Clear skies,
Justin
Reply to: