Hi QA! The source package pgeasy has no proper copyright (please see #227793); its homepage says it is BSD, but there is not a single copyright statement in the source tarball itself. Its upstream author promised to release a new version some weeks ago, but did not report back so far. Would it be appropriate in this case to remove pgeasy from testing? This should not be a problem: martin@donald:~$ apt-cache rdepends libpgeasy libpgeasy Reverse Depends: libpgeasy-dev It seems that pgeasy is not very widely used anyway... I don't really care about the package (I just maintain it because I operated it out of the main postgresql source package), however I would maintain it further if there was be an updated version in the future. So I would vote for removing it from testing, but to keep it in unstable for a while. What do you think? What shall I do in this case? Bug Report against ftp.d.o or qa.d.o? Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer martin@piware.de mpitt@debian.org http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
pgpRQbkRNalhZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature