Re: Splitting ITA into two
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:54:54PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> This has been discussed before[1], but it'd really be nice to have a
> distinction between an ITA in response to a RFA, and an ITA in response
> to an O.
Ok, my first guess was "nice to have", my second one was "but has this
some real actual advantages?" Are there any?
I definetly don't like the idea of renaming O without changing its
definition.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: