[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: snacc status?



On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 02:05:27AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On July 5, W. Borgert offered to try and fix the RC bug for snacc.
> Has progress been made?  I have some experience with the auto* tools,
> and perhaps I would be able to fix the problem, but I don't want to
> step on anyoone's toes.

Any help very much appreciated!  What I did until now:

1. autoreconf -fi

2. changed debian/rules to use CDBS (and moved the *.files
   to *.install), which makes maintainance and build process
   hopefully easier.

What I will do:

1. Remove the -dbg package, because it's huge and a waste
   of space for a very specialised package.

2. Maybe set the debian/control:Priority to extra.

I would be very happy, if you could take a look on my work.
I can upload the packages to my people.d.o page first and
send you an e-mail about it, OK?

Thanks in advance!

Btw.: In parallel I tried to debianise the new upstream
SNACC (called eSNACC) which has a lot of new features.
Unfortunately, the new upstream changed a lot of things, so
that some of the tools do not build by default anymore etc.

Cheers,
-- 
W. Borgert <debacle@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~debacle/



Reply to: