Re: guile-oops

["Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:32:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Egads!
> 
> So I go to try and prepare a QA upload of guile-oops to orphan it properly,
> and it's currently a native package. I just converted visualos to a
> non-native package, so I figure I'll have a go with guile-oops.
> 
> The bloody thing's got a tarball inside its source tarball. What should I do
> in this case? Leave it as a native package? Run away?

You have to restart debian version by -1. 
That typically requires epoch if upstream version cannot be updated.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine