[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload



* Martin Michlmayr [Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:38:07 +0100]:
> * Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es> [2004-06-20 20:17]:
> > since I have not yet decided if I'm to adopt it or not (upstream
> > seems to be dead)

> Maybe it should just be removed?

  I'd remove it from testing right now.

  Thinking about completely removing it leads me to a question about the
  package removal proposed by Andreas Barth: having the suite of
  packages in unstable and testing to differ *considerably*, is a good
  or a bad think? Should it be encouraged, avoided, or just tolerated?

  There may be *many* packages which shouldn't ship with a stable Debian
  release but which may be worth keeping in the archive, herein my
  question, since having them in unstable and not in testing (via a
  fake RC bug) is the only way (at the moment) to achieve so.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
And don't get me wrong - I don't mind getting proven wrong. I change my
opinions the way some people change underwear. And I think that's ok.
                -- Linus Torvalds



Reply to: