Bug#250347: packages.qa.d.o reports testing migration problem when there isn't one
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 14:21 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> That's not guaranteed, mind you ... "Valid candidate" only means that it
> goes on to the next set of checks after the obvious and fast checks.
Right, but I wasn't drawing the conclusion from that. I had checked
bjorn.haxx.se, and I otherwise assume that it will go in because I am
not aware of any reasons for it to not do that. But thanks for
clarifying, anyway.
--
Pelle
Reply to: