Hi,
I am forwarding Christophe's answer
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<pmachard@debian.org> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Pierre Machard <pmachard@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Your Debian package
- From: Christophe Le Bars <clebars@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:14:20 +0100
- Message-id: <87smhbj92b.fsf@opale.opale-int>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040214160712.GB17758@bretagne.cn> (Pierre Machard's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:07:12 +0100")
- References: <[🔎] 20040214160712.GB17758@bretagne.cn>
Pierre Machard <pmachard@debian.org> writes: > I am sending you this email in about your package motioneye. I've > previously NMUed this package and I wonder if it should be removed from > Debian. According to the upstream website, "This driver was integrated in > the official linux kernel starting with the 2.4.7 kernel." Hi, The package never contained the driver but only the userspace tool motioneye which uses the driver. > Upstream mentionned additionnal utilities. Is it valuable for Debian to > include this package ? Personally I think yes and the upstream author, whom I asked for, also. A+
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature