[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Your Debian packages



Hi,

On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 02:26:09AM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> >>>>> In <[🔎] 20040214162443.GC12394@bretagne.cn> 
> >>>>>	Pierre Machard <pmachard@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > I am sending you this email about your packages and your involvement in
> > Debian. According to the BTS there are severals anoying bugs in a2ps and 
> > abiword which made these softwares nearly unusable in certain
> > circumstances. (#214722, #226145, ... and #231649, #226081, ...)
> 
> First, I was back from forced vacation (due to Debian machine
> compromises and the following GPG key invalidation) only recently.
> I'm quite active these days, maybe you should have checked
> debian-devel-changes@l.d.o and counted how many times "mhatta" shows
> up.  Anyway that's why I got a bunch of back logs.  Thank you for
> depressing me.

Thanks for your quick answer.

> Bugs w.r.t. CVS snapshot of a2ps will be fixed when I upload new
> package based on the old 4.13b.  AbiWord bugs - Bug#231649 is not
> really abiword's bug (I've already uploaded new libwpd7 package a week
> ago and it doesn't enter the archive yet) and I have no idea why you
> say Bug#226081 makes abiword "unusable".

A mistake on my side. 

> > Could you please at least answered to bugs submitters ?
> 
> I will, but now I'd rather like to concentrate on fixing bugs.
> 
> > For blender, do you plan to fix the RC Bug #229420 ? 
> 
> I thought it would have been nice to move to auto* build system before
> fixing that bug, but today I'm informed that the upstream will abandon
> the entire auto* build system soon and will move to the SCons scheme
> which I have no idea what the heck it is.  Thus I'll prepare yet
> another 2.32 release soon, with a fix for Bug#229420.  Fair enough?
> 
> > According to the PTS you are maintaining 31 packages in main, It could be
> > valuable to find co-maintainers for some packages.
> 
> gs-esp has co-maintainer Kenshi Muto.  Actually, most of my packages
> are not really laborious, but still you may do NMUs if you want.

Ok. Thanks for the notice.
-- 
                                Pierre Machard
<pmachard@debian.org>                                 http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: