Yes I agree that it should be removed immediately, particularly in light
of the fact that it can produce erroneous output merely depending upon
how the input is grouped. I would take a stab at fixing the bugs, but I
don't know lex, and tend to agree with Aaron about better alternatives
being available.
Cheers,
tony
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:41:35PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Laurent Fousse <laurent@komite.net> [2004-01-28 11:37]:
> > While looking at the bugs of gtkgraph I wondered if a newer upstream
> > version was available. However:
> >
> > - mei@fas.harvard.edu bounces,
> > - Aaron Lehman told me the project is dead upstream and he thinks
> > there are better alternatives anyway.
> > - the package has reached the "orphaned for 6 months" criteria.
> > - bugs #230009 and #103239 are really bad for a scientific calculator
> > emulation.
>
> Tony, this sounds like a reasonable suggestion; what do you think?
>
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> tbm@cyrius.com
--
Q: How many Bell Labs Vice Presidents does it take to change a light bulb?
A: That's proprietary information. Answer available from AT&T on payment
of license fee (binary only).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature