[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#211228: marked as done (developer.php: please supply repeatmerged=no)



Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:27:33 +0200
with message-id <20030918162733.GC1181@tass.genibel.org>
and subject line Close this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2003 16:55:48 +0000
>From rene@rene-engelhard.de Tue Sep 16 11:55:45 2003
Return-path: <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.250] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19zJ79-0000j7-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:55:43 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.220] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
	by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 19zJ79-0004Ju-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:55:43 +0200
Received: from [80.146.44.138] (helo=frodo)
	by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 19zJ78-0002S6-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:55:43 +0200
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8DAB96265B; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:54:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:54:42 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: developer.php: please supply repeatmerged=no
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030916165442.GI28325@rene-engelhard.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.28
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_ORBS
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-16
Severity: wishlist

Hi, me again :)

http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Drene; openoffice.org has
dozens of merged bugs. I occassionally go over all bugs and do a mass
severity-changing, reassigning, tagging etc.

So what the current links show is repeatmerged=3Dyes which is not ideal
because I have more bugs than actually there I have to look at.
What about doing the following:?

developer.php shows the bug count as 1(2) when there are two bugs
merged to one. What about linking the 1 to repeatmerged=3Dno and 2 to
repeatmerged=3Dyes? The same with the colum "All" where currently is
no repeatmerged specified anyhow so it is yes.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro

Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,

Ren=E9
--=20
 .''`.  Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
     =20

--uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Z0BR+FmQsCSK63MRAjYWAJwLKCBFTKbApkJy9p8Q95mwi0IwVgCeP9/X
p7uFyPvcRUkm2oxZN+Ow1/s=
=FYdq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 211228-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2003 16:27:36 +0000
>From igor@genibel.org Thu Sep 18 11:27:34 2003
Return-path: <igor@genibel.org>
Received: from atoulouse-201-2-1-120.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr (tass.genibel.org) [193.251.11.120] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A01d0-000119-00; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:27:34 -0500
Received: from igor by tass.genibel.org with local (Exim 4.22)
	id 1A01cz-0004UO-AE
	for 211228-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:27:33 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:27:33 +0200
From: Igor Genibel <igor@genibel.org>
To: 211228-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Close this
Message-ID: <20030918162733.GC1181@tass.genibel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-URL: http:/www.genibel.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 211228-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
	tests=none
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

The functionality is now available

Thanks.
-- 
Igor Genibel 
http://www.answare.fr/                             igor.genibel@eds.com
http://www.tuxfamily.org/			     igor@tuxfamily.net
http://people.debian.org/~igenibel		    igenibel@debian.org
GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92  9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F



Reply to: