Bug#204693: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Debian logo has ugly underscores next to it)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2003 07:55:07 +0300
with message-id <200308270755.07267.elonen@iki.fi>
and subject line Bug#204693: qa.debian.org: Debian logo has ugly underscores next to it
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2003 12:23:00 +0000
>From elonen@iki.fi Sat Aug 09 07:22:56 2003
Return-path: <elonen@iki.fi>
Received: from cs162253.pp.htv.fi (supertiger) [213.243.162.253]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19lSkI-0003hl-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 07:22:54 -0500
Received: id 19lSkG-0005bU-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:22:52 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Jarno Elonen <elonen@iki.fi>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: qa.debian.org: Debian logo has ugly underscores next to it
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:22:52 +0300
Message-Id: <E19lSkG-0005bU-00@supertiger>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_20_30,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-09
Severity: minor
The Debian logo in the top of the page is currently coded in HTML as...
<a href="http://www.debian.org/">
<img src="http://www.debian.org/Pics/debian.jpg" ...>
</a>
...causing ugly looking underscores (underlined spaces) just before
and after the image on many browsers because they interpret the linefeeds
as whitespaces. This can be fixed by putting the whole thing on the same line
or by breaking the lines inside the tags:
<a ...><img ...></a>
or
<a ...
><img ...
></a>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204693-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2003 04:55:42 +0000
>From elonen@iki.fi Tue Aug 26 23:55:09 2003
Return-path: <elonen@iki.fi>
Received: from smtp3.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.135]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19rsKr-0003Ba-00; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 23:55:09 -0500
Received: from posti.pp.htv.fi (posti.pp.htv.fi [212.90.64.50])
by smtp3.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0E4B327B5EE; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 07:55:08 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from cs162253.pp.htv.fi (cs162253.pp.htv.fi [213.243.162.253])
by posti.pp.htv.fi (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h7R4t7502618;
Wed, 27 Aug 2003 07:55:07 +0300 (EETDST)
From: Jarno Elonen <elonen@iki.fi>
To: Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#204693: qa.debian.org: Debian logo has ugly underscores next to it
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 07:55:07 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3
Cc: 204693-done@bugs.debian.org
References: <E19lSkG-0005bU-00@supertiger> <20030826153153.GA17338@regression.cyrius.com> <20030827030420.GA22600@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
In-Reply-To: <20030827030420.GA22600@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200308270755.07267.elonen@iki.fi>
Delivered-To: 204693-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
> I don't see any problem any more. Mozilla 1.4.
Yep, looks nice and clean with Konqueror 3.1.3, too, and looking at the
source, I don't see any reason why not with any sane browser. Closing the bug
now.
Reply to: