On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:57:05PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > > Let's restore qa.d.o. I have checked CVS and it looks okay. However, > > So where are we ? I'm still waiting for the MX DNS entry in order to have > a fully working PTS ... > > PTS is checked, ddpo is check, the rest is probably also checked, isn't > it ? To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like to propose the following: I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed it in /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa. There is a file named /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa.list which gives the audit status for each file or directory. Please update that file if you audited something that is still marked UNCHECKED. There is also a possibly-compromised-cvs-head directory and a similar list. Note that there may be differences between the cvs HEAD and the file in possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa. Only tag them clean after checking the diff. Something like [1] might help you to check if what you audited in -copy-of-qa is the same as in -cvs-head. Ideally we will end up without any items tagged UNCHECKED. tbm wrote in an earlier mail: > Also, can people who run QA cronjobs please check them and enable them > if they are okay (people in the "qa" unix group have access to klecker). Once we are done I can enable some. Others require rethinking on how we handle updates and automated building. Peter 1. for i in `cd possibly-compromised-cvs-head; find data/debcheck -type f | grep -v CVS`; do ls -l possibly-compromised-cvs-head/$i possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa/$i ; diff -u possibly-compromised-cvs-head/$i possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa/$i ; done -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred. | : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature