Re: About requests for co-maintainers
- To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
- Cc: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Subject: Re: About requests for co-maintainers
- From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 03:20:02 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20030901082002.GB31459@debian.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- In-reply-to: <20030828111006.GA9076@firewall.ba.issia.cnr.it> <20030828094614.GF29886@riva.ucam.org>
- References: <20030809034630.GJ27489@alcor.net> <20030809072941.GA18981@regression.cyrius.com> <20030828085516.GH11506@debian.org> <20030828111006.GA9076@firewall.ba.issia.cnr.it> <200308090217.36118.raphael@nicedays.net> <20030809034630.GJ27489@alcor.net> <20030809072941.GA18981@regression.cyrius.com> <20030828085516.GH11506@debian.org> <20030828090834.GF9331@mails.so.argh.org> <20030828094614.GF29886@riva.ucam.org>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I suggest that you don't waste your time on trying to do this until we
> implement bug ownership.
Ok, I suppose you'll announce this somewhere.
> ... and Request-for-Sponsoring, the pending tag could be extremely useful for
> tracking status of all sponsoring reqs. Every new sponsoree req could
> reopen a previous bug and a new sponsor upload could fix it.
> Whenever the sponsoree became a DD he could definitively close the bug.
This is a good idea too.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they
local LANG="it_IT@euro" | don't depend on the language.
Reply to: