Bug#207224: marked as done (developer.php: upstream-fixed in fixed while not fixed ;-))
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:20:18 +0200
with message-id <20030826082018.GB2921@tass.genibel.org>
and subject line Close this one
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2003 19:09:20 +0000
>From martin@godisch.de Mon Aug 25 14:09:18 2003
Return-path: <martin@godisch.de>
Received: from julius.godisch.de (mx.godisch.de) [217.69.161.76]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19rMiL-0006o9-00; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:09:17 -0500
Received: from pd9e84061.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.232.64.97] helo=carlos.godisch.de)
by mx.godisch.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
id 19rMiK-0003Wx-HY
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:09:16 +0200
Received: from godisch by carlos.godisch.de with local (Exim/Debian)
id 19rMiK-0004mm-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:09:16 +0200
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:09:16 +0200
From: Martin Godisch <martin@godisch.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: developer.php: upstream-fixed in fixed while not fixed ;-)
Message-ID: <20030825190916.GA18473@carlos.godisch.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-GPG-ID: 0x68DCD606
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 2AB1 9CDD 4BA9 D7FB 6927 5A9E 9A91 821D 68DC D606
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Martin Godisch <martin@godisch.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-25
Severity: normal
noffle has a "fixed-upstream" bug (#202105). This bug is shown in column
"F&P" at http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=noffle. Clicking on
this entry doesn't show the bug, it shows up in "M&W" instead.
Kind regards,
Martin
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 207224-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2003 08:20:22 +0000
>From igor@genibel.org Tue Aug 26 03:20:20 2003
Return-path: <igor@genibel.org>
Received: from atoulouse-201-2-1-120.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr (tass.genibel.org) [193.251.11.120]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19rZ3r-0006iI-00; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:20:20 -0500
Received: from igor by tass.genibel.org with local (Exim 4.22)
id 19rZ3q-0001uE-U8
for 207224-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:20:18 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:20:18 +0200
From: Igor Genibel <igenibel@debian.org>
To: 207224-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Close this one
Message-ID: <20030826082018.GB2921@tass.genibel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-URL: http:/www.debian.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Igor Genibel <igor@genibel.org>
Delivered-To: 207224-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I applied the patch provided by Colin Watson to process-index.pl.
fixed-uptream is no longer considered as a severity but a tag
Cheers
--=20
Igor Genibel=20
http://www.answare.fr/ igor.genibel@eds.com
http://www.tuxfamily.org/ igor@tuxfamily.net
http://people.debian.org/~igenibel igenibel@debian.org
GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/SxhCxEsCZp1zW08RArDXAJ9SuU/XtoYxRWbyswE8XzrADCdHhACg2pSV
HIgcf3Y6NBA+g3XCLlXFx+4=
=s5Gs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--
Reply to: