Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> writes: > Is fltk still needed (since fltk1.1 is newer)? A few things still depend on it, though they really ought to be rebuilt against 1.1, if only to make the g++ transition. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger amu@monk.mit.edu (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.