[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: retitling ITP's [round 2]

Hi Luca!

You wrote:

> > I intend to retitle those to RFPs:
> Is it the procedure?
> I mean: if no one packaged them in more than a year, it could mean there is
> no one interested in that package any more.
> More over, some of that software may no longer be developed or even exists.
> IMHO we may close those kind of reports, along with those older RFP.

Hmm, perhaps you are right.  However, my motivation to seek out the
non-active ITPs in the first place, is to give other developers a chance
to work on those packages.

You are probably right though, that RFPs should be closed after being
inactive for a while.  There are only 54 RFPs in the WNPP atm though, so
I don't this is really a problem yet.

Kind regards,
| Bas Zoetekouw              | GPG key: 0644fab7                     |
|----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| bas@o2w.nl, bas@debian.org |              a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |

Reply to: